Tuesday, May 1, 2007

My latest transit idea: 1) A shuttle; 2) A second Loop

I started a new thread for this because I wanted to just focus any discussion on this particular proposal. Anyway guys, I have a new one. It's pie in the sky as ever, but perhaps 30 years from now when the floodgates of transit spending finally open, something similar to this could possibly happen? They are two proposals but they kind of work well together.

And they're simple:

1) A shuttle. For those of you not familiar with NYC's system, there is a nice underground shuttle (basically a subway line) that runs back and forth between Grand Central Terminal and Times Square's station. How about the same concept, ie a subway 'shuttle', between Union Station and the Block 37 'superstation'? Just one route, no stops in between, going back and forth? Imagine this if an Airport express line develops, along with the future West Loop transit center. Both will be linked.

2) A second loop. Simply put, it runs underground and serves River North/Streeterville (with a stop at Navy Pier). It runs east and connects to the blue/brown/red lines, goes to Navy Pier, turns and runs north to Northwestern, turns west, again connects to the previously mentioned lines, and runs south using the existing blue line ROW.

If both plans are implemented, a suburbanite riding Metra into Union Station can hop on the shuttle to Block 37, switch to the red line up to the 'second loop' line and ride it east to his job as a Radiologist at Northwestern.

(disclaimer: all characters in this description are purely fictional and any similarities to real individuals are purely coincidental)

Any thoughts?>

Here's to a New Year

May 2007 bring good times to the city of Chicago, new construction, and of course, new fantastic proposals!!





>

Need info on the Donnelly Building Please

Trying to find out the timeline of the Donnelly Building from ground breaking to completion if possible.

Any help welcome

Thanks >

Changing Central Chicago: effect nationally, internationally?

How (if at all) will a changing and growing downtown Chicago, an area acquiring more and more critical mass and 24/7 hours play out nationally...and even internationally?

I know we have an enormous overlap in what we discuss here; I hope IÂ'm clear enough on this thread to differentiate this from previous topics.

The exciting type of growth and development in downtown Chicago is probably unmatched (IMHO) anywhere in America but in Manhattan. We have a central city that is establishing itself as a place with precious few peers. The number of people who have moved to the downtown area is mind boggling. Their migration has brought with it increased retail, dining, culture, streetlife....and has added to an already incredible and magnificent setting.

But a lot of the growth we see in Chicago plays out largely locally and regionally and only to a degree nationally.

The question here is: Will the changes in our downtown area and its ability to be inviting to anyone seeking a comprehensive urban environment make Chicago more inviting as a place of business and culture for those across the nation - and among the influential elements in the international community?

Chicago to me may be unique in the US. Among global cities, it seems to play a middle role between playing out regionally and nationally than any other. Personally I think that New York, Washington, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and even Miami feel more comfortable (or are more capable?) in their national and even international roles.

Are we creating something here on the ground that will change this? Will we see new cultural institutions attracted to the setting we have? Will we see more of the street vibrancy of New York or San Francisco? More of the reaching abroad like Miami or LA?

Have we done our homework downtown and in its environs to make Chicago less provenical and more of a magnet nationally and internationally? Is this alpha world class city really ready to play on an international (or even national) stage?

*******

Note: I wrote this in respect to all cities mentioned (and ones that were not). IÂ'm not talking about competiton with them. I am talking about creating an environment that propells a city into a more national and international environment.>

High School Photo thread: could we use it?

Could we use a high school photo thread here?

I ask that because like our colleges, our high schools tend to be well known (how many people are not aware of Lane, Northside, Payon, New Trier, Evanston, Stevenson, Hinsdale C, Oak Park, R-B, H-F, Thornton, etc.

Unlike the colleges, however, we don't really know what these schools look like. i'm sure if anyone has any pix of their high school (or others) with any annotation, many of us would find it quite interesting.>

Why the Chinese love Chicago

CHICAGO - Chicago is rated in the top three best business cities in the United States by Chinese decision-makers who choose American cities in which to invest. But a survey released on Tuesday also revealed that Chinese executives are unaware of many of Chicago's key business strengths.

The survey, commissioned by World Business Chicago and the Chicago Council on Global Affairs and coordinated by Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management, also



assesses Chinese business leaders' perceptions of different US cities.

The survey showed that Chinese leaders rely on specific criteria in identifying a North American city in which to invest.

Of most importance (in order of importance) are: a strong technology center, tax incentives, supportive local government, a large business center, a strong distribution system, the number of corporate headquarters, and proximity to supplies and buyers.

Less important attributes include a low cost of living, presence of other Chinese businesses and cultural resources.

When asked which North American cities were "the best cities to do business", 69% named New York, 57% named Chicago and 40% named San Francisco - while Washington, DC (35%) and Los Angeles (31%) trailed in the open-ended question.

Chicago was perceived positively relative to New York, Boston, San Francisco and Los Angeles on factors identified as most important to the business leaders surveyed, including a central location, tax incentives, a strong distribution system and local government support.

Although the survey found that there is high awareness of Chicago, it also showed that people lacked specific knowledge of the city.

Interestingly, Chicago was perceived as second to New York for being a tech center, while San Francisco ranked fifth. Chicago was also perceived as second for having the best business schools and the largest population (Chicago was perceived to have a larger population than Los Angeles).

But the city was also thought to be not "in touch" with China and many felt it was not centrally located and did not have a high quality of life.

Paul O'Connor, executive director of World Business Chicago, and Tim Calkins, professor of marketing at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management, presented the findings this week to more than 200 of Chicago's business leaders at the Chicago Club.

"The good news is that Chicago has surprisingly high awareness in China as a business city," said Paul O'Connor. "The bad news is that their understanding of our business assets is shallow and vague. We need to do a much better job of communicating the city's key attributes - largest airport, most non-stop flights to Shanghai, most diversified economy, best railroad connections, and two world-leading business schools."

The study noted the primary reason for selecting a particular US city was to gain access to the US market and capital. Chinese business investors look for a welcoming business environment and Pacific-oriented attitude.

"We are striving for the world to see that Chinese cultural and business assets are abundant in Chicago," said Marshall Bouton, president of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs.

"Foreign investors need to know that we have everything from the largest Chinese-language program in the US in our public schools, to one of the most business-friendly local governments, to an extensive list of authentic Chinese cultural institutions and restaurants, all with tremendous access to the American market."
Research for the study was done in phases and conducted by NuVista Strategies Inc. Initially, secondary research was reviewed and qualitative interviews with more than three dozen Chinese and American executives were completed.

The group then assessed perceptions of Chicago among mid-level Chinese executives with a web-based quantitative survey completed by 200 Chinese business executives. Finally, the group completed qualitative interviews with Chinese business executives in Shanghai who are involved in foreign investment decisions.

"This was an important project for Chicago, because the growth of China is one of the key global trends of the 21st century," said Calkins. "The results are very encouraging. This study is a call to action for business and civic leaders of Chicago."

The survey was an initial step in branding Chicago for the Chinese market.

Research shows that if current trends continue, China will be the biggest economy in the world by 2013. To date, most Chinese investment has been in Asia, but investment in North America is set to rise sharply.

(Asia Pulse)

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China_B.../HK16Cb03.html>

Lifting Height Restrictions

Lifting height restrictions

What neighborhoods would (if at all) you like to see height restrictions lifted? If you had the magic marker, where would you draw the high-rise line?

Currently there are height restrictions outside of the Downtown area and the immediate lakefront. Some of you have suggested removing such restrictions for developments that run along major streets and areas surrounding public transportation. While IÂ'll agree with densifying (if there is such a word) areas near public transportation but I wonÂ't readily agree that high-rises should go up all over the city on main streets and intersections. That concept will only ruin the feel of the city, and change the whole Chicago neighborhood charm that is so endearing to many – living in the city while living in an area that is toned down and maintains more human scales.

Aside from the fact that neighborhoods, that are currently unrestricted, have plenty of parking lots or existing properties that donÂ't utilize its location to its fullest I think that we should if at all try to maintain the feel of the city as much as possible – highrises and scrapers are downtown and immediate lake front while nothing over 3-4 stories in the outlaying areas.

In the spirit of expanding though I would propose that we try to maintain the highrise/skyscrapers as close to already existing highrize/skyscraper areas. So I might select a hand full of neighborhoods to lift the height restrictions throughout such as Lincoln Park, Buck Town, Wicker Park, Lakeview, Uptown, Edgewater, Rogers Park, west town, Ukrainian village, Bronzeville, Oakland, Kenwood, Hyde Park, etc. I undertand that parts of some of there neighborhoods already have highrizes but im talking about alowing it thoughout the entire neiborhood
Basicly I would extend the lake front high-rises out west a mile or so all up and down the coast and extend out into neighborhoods surrounding downtown.

How would do it?>

Chicago Mixed Bag of Photos 2005: Part 1, Far NW Side + Skokie

OK folks, here is the starter thread of what will be a serries covering nearly every neighborhood picture I took in 2005. Due to my busy schedual as a student, very few of these have been edited so, here is chicago in the raw. Most of the pics will come from my account on spanfish, which compresses the images and makes uploading quicker. The serries will cover all sides of the city, with some neighborhoods having more pics than others, as my free time is limited and you can never take enough pictures.

Ready y'all? Here.....We...Go.....



In Part 1 we will Cover Skokie just outside the city limits first, then Edison Park (Highlighted in Blue) and Jefferson Park (in Green). We'll come back to Norwood Park later (in Orange), as I would like to grab some more images of it. Without further delay, lets get going....

SKOKIE
Skokie has a little bit of an idenity crises, its part urban neighborhood, part pre-war suburb and part post-war suburb. Since its never shown on here I thought I would give it just a smidgen of love....

Downtown:

Summer

Winter


Infill





More infill






See what I mean, Skokie goes from a great urban style setting to barren post-war suburbia. Its an interesting beast with very leapfrog style growth, that had the blanks filled in with auto-centric stuff.


Skokie Swift (CTA Yellow Line) Station at Dempster Street

Back to the city....
EDISON PARK


For whatever reason, these statues can be found in quite a few courtyards of these 1960's aprtment buildings.

Neighborhood Fesitival







Here is the blending of municipal boundries. I am standing on the border of Chicago and the suburb of Park Ridge, and the interesting thig is that the city limits continue stright on from where I am standing. Acording to zoning maps the boundry runs right through this house on the right. It does actually have two addresses, I wonder which city gets the residenicy claim, or the taxes for that matter.



Me thinks the homeowner on the left should invest in a set of hedge clippers.





I spy Sears from 12 miles out

JEFFERSON PARK


Patroitic Block


Rufus Hitch Elementry School. I love Chicago's urban schools, and as such there are plenty more comming in this serries.




Even in the post-war areas of the city, houses are often mixed with two and three flats.

These cute little houses are locally refered to as "Gorgians"


Another Neighborhood School


Jefferson Park "Skyline"


Vintage and Retro


This is Beaubian Elemmentary School. Just turned 100 years old.




This old concrete plant has a date with the wrecking ball sometime in the near future. Midrise condos are being planned for the site.




Jefferson Park (The actual park)


Remember that courtyard statue from earlier, another '60s courtyard building, another statue.




Look ma, another one!





This home was built in the early 1900's back when Jefferson Township was a rural farming community.


More '60s


These two houses will be replaced with a 8 unit condo building


Three eras of construction. Early 21st Century, early 20th century, and mid 20th century.





Masonic Temple, built in 1901



I spy Sears agian


These cape cod houses are locally reffered to as "Englishes"




Block party, quite common in the city.

Nature in the city

A forest preserve a half block from my house

Our Block party....




My Street, this morning




---------------JEFFERSON PARK INFILL----------------------------






Right between the houses




Doomed house

Same house, from the rear


And a week later, the house is gone...



These next few are of a infill project done tastefully by suburban home developer Concord Homes
Single family homes:




Garages in the back where they belong, but good lord do I hate the vinyal sidding

Townhouses:




That's all for part one. I hope you guys learned something new along the way so far. Stay tuned, more to come in the next few days!>