U.S. Cellular Field: What does it do better?

The Wrigley v. Fenway thread in the US forum got me thinking about how great Wrigley really is. The nostalgia, location, tradition, neighborhood, etc. mak perhaps the best atmosphere for any pro sports venue in the country. But what, if anything, do you think "The Cell" does better? The many phases of rennovations over the past few years have it much more fan friendly, but they have also reduced its capacity to a few hundred less seats than Wrigley. And while Wrigley is surrounded by high density flats and mid-rises, The Cell is surrounded by parking lots. So again, what do you think The Cell does better than Wrigley Field? (And no... winning the World Series doesn' count here )>